Wednesday, December 5, 2007

Question the Validity of "Fact Findings" Deaf Blog!

Questioning the validity of "Fact Findings" Deaf Blogsite. Who is really behind this blog? What is the name of author/blogger, please. Thanks!

"Fact Findings" deaf blog is questionably validated with the so-called fact findings of the Deaf American Community. The blogger and blog itself do not provide any kind of statistical information or circuminstal evidence(s) at all.

How interestings of many deaf bloggers and commentators, who openly identified themselves thru familar screen name and real name as Jack Barr and other mores. Those deaf individuals convey and express their own inner thoughts honestly and unrestricted as compared to other deaf and hearing individuals using anonymous and deceived online alias.

Will you kindly please identify yourself as the blogger of "Fact Findings"? Or we will dismiss your fact findings from now on.

You know that there are such deaf societal norms and expectations for identifying ourselves to the given deaf community. Or consider such a violation of our "unwritten" deaf community pact.

Welcome to the DeafRead blogsphere whoever you are!

ASLize yours,
Robert L. Mason (RLM)
RLMDEAF blog

30 comments:

  1. RLM, Forgot them. I did leave a comment on his/her blog then he/she changed blog again then my comment disappeared while he/she added my link to that blog which didn't make sense. What blog? here is http://blog.deafread.com/factfindings/2007/11/30/south-dakotas-cochlear-implant-program/

    He/she couldn't find a fact while added a link which I commented. That blog is way off and no sense to talk about.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I read the entry you're talking about, and what you wrote doesn't make sense. The author makes it clear, by her word choice and syntax, that she is expressing an OPINION. Last I heard, people were still free to do that without being required to cite a source.
    Your entry is baseless, in my opinion.

    ReplyDelete
  3. n/a

    I received only ONE comment to my blog regarding South Dakota's cochlear implant program. If you were that person, you suggested that I add a link to my blog which was already there. I emailed you to let you know that I didn't bother to approve your comment because the link was already there.

    RLM, I have been in touch with several people regarding no sign language allowed and the form Jack mentioned in his vlog, and I am waiting for their replies. I intend to present whatever I find. I did present an evidence of email between me and the Executive Director of CDHH. Is that not enough? Did you see in my blog that I contacted Vaughn Hallada via email? He responded, and we have tentatively agreed to talk with each other after 12/14/07. Is that not enough for you? What more do you want from me?

    I would be more than happy to come forward, but right now, my gut tells me to wait. When I am ready to reveal myself, I will. Don't rush me, please.

    If you all want to dismiss my blog, be my guest.

    Hey, why don't you check out the vlog "Know What?" by Deafy*** (can't remember that name)? Let me know what you think of his story about a mother being told she can't leave the hospital with her baby unless the baby has a cochlear implant.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I am glad that you are challenging the nameless and faceless person behind the Fact Findings Blog. I couldnt believe that some people are gullible to believe what the faceless and nameless person behind the blog said without no strong evidence. Just talks! We must take some more time to research and see what the truth is. I have seen some people lying or denying. We need to see documents which are the best evidence. Some people are sneaky to say something conning and then deny that s/he said that. No proof on the paper and we are stuck. Thanks again for questioning the validity of that blog!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Agree with Anonymous. glad you challenge Factfinder. i think Factfinder is a staff member at Gally. He's always a snooper and spy - troublemaker. Don't post anything on his blog.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I think fact finder need to get a life because he or she is jealous that Jack's Eyes is so popular so he or she want to do the "crab theory" thing. It is so pathetic that he or she decided to harass Jack as much as he or she can.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Factfinder must be woman.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Factfinder is Jennifer Dans-Willey.

    The video of her is on http://www.sdad.org/

    ReplyDelete
  9. The factfinder may be either Jennifer Dans-Willey (SD) or Brenda Rennie (Mass).

    ReplyDelete
  10. Please do not blame Jennifer or Brenda. I am not either of them.

    ReplyDelete
  11. All right RLM, you win. I am sorry that I had to lie to you all before. I am really Jennifer Dans-Wiley. Please forget what I have done and move on.

    ReplyDelete
  12. So-called Fact Findings, I am appalled you are using my name to lie to RLM and everyone that I am supposedly Jennifer Dans-Wiley. Shame on you, you sick impostor.

    RLM, please delete the posting from so-called Fact Findings that pretended to be Jennifer. I SWEAR I AM NOT JENNIFER. You can contact Jennifer at her SDAD address and verify this with her.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Several people urged me privately to delete the impostor's so-called claims to be Jennifer Dans-Wiley.

    One of the respectable individual made a good point about the responsiblity of editor to select and delete incoming letters to be approriate for the publication of letters to the editor.

    I will be more than glad to delete the impostor's claim to be you. Okay?

    Many thanks for letting me know. :)

    Robert L. Mason (RLM)

    ReplyDelete
  14. Jennifer,

    I could not possibly find any feature to delete per comments. I have to go back to the "moderate the comments" feature to screen and block and post comments.

    I really do not want to block or screen comments. I do not have time in front of computer screen. Okay?

    At least, you, Jennifer Daley-Wans already defend yourself from the falsehood.

    Do you, Jennifer Daley-Wans, still want me to delete the Fact Finder's comment or what?

    I will be not at my computer all Friday evening til tommorow afternoon. Okay?

    At least, people could see that someone is a dishonest person hirself.

    Robert L. Mason (RLM)

    ReplyDelete
  15. RLM,

    I appreciated that you are trying to delete the comments for me. I realized that it's not fair for everyone so please leave the comments for now. Let them think that I am Jennifer Dans-Wiley anyway.

    ReplyDelete
  16. FACT FINDINGS is OSCAR SERN.

    http://blog.deafread.com/oscar1997/

    ReplyDelete
  17. Your idea simply excellent

    ReplyDelete
  18. Opulently I agree but I dream the list inform should secure more info then it has.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Opulently I agree but I about the collection should secure more info then it has.

    ReplyDelete
  20. It is extremely interesting for me to read this blog. Thank author for it. I like such themes and everything that is connected to this matter. I would like to read more soon.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Thanks for the informative information - I enjoyed reading it! I always enjoy this blog. :) Cheers, mother giving birth video

    ReplyDelete
  22. I wish not acquiesce in on it. I regard as nice post. Expressly the title attracted me to review the sound story.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Genial brief and this fill someone in on helped me alot in my college assignement. Thanks you for your information.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Rather cool site you've got here. Thank you for it. I like such themes and everything connected to this matter. BTW, try to add some pics :).

    ReplyDelete
  25. http://www.naturalpath.com/tummy-tuck
    [url=http://www.naturalpath.com/tummy-tuck]tummy tuck[/url]
    [url=http://www.naturalpath.com/tummy-tuck]complete abdominoplasty[/url]

    ReplyDelete
  26. Hello, I now became a part of this forum here and I would love to be a part of it. Just enjoy the environment here. Great job by the mods and every member here. I appreciate the quality of posts provided by everyone and plan I can do that for you all too. Just to start off, I discovered a great site named [url=http://www.home-businessreviews.com]home based business opportunity[/url] that reviews some great home business opportunity . Anyway website owner earn's more than up to 15K USD month. He found some very great home based business reviews. Because I found that these money making opportunities worked for me I decided to post it here so you also can make some extra bucks in your free time. Owner of this site also found really simple way make some extra money just taking [url=http://www.home-businessreviews.com/Surveys-For-Money.html]surveys for money[/url]. Anyway if you need to earn some extra cash feel free to check out this website. Hope you guys enjoy it. OK, look forward to great conversation and hanging out here often. www.home-businessreviews.com

    ReplyDelete
  27. Today is my lucky day :)
    Apple is giving review copies of iPad to 100 lucky person. Go to http://bit.ly/d9QOON and apply for it.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Genial fill someone in on and this fill someone in on helped me alot in my college assignement. Gratefulness you as your information.

    ReplyDelete
  29. greetings to all.
    I would first like to thank the writers of this blog by sharing information, a few years ago I read a book called guanacaste costa rica in this book deal with questions like this one.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Hello .. firstly I would like to send greetings to all readers. After this, I recognize the content so interesting about this article. For me personally I liked all the information. I would like to know of cases like this more often. In my personal experience I might mention a book called Generic Viagra in this book that I mentioned have very interesting topics, and also you have much to do with the main theme of this article.

    ReplyDelete