Friday, June 11, 2010

Is RLMDEAF Slanderous/Libelous Toward Jon Dresser?

Several anonymous commentators accused me of being slanderous and libelous toward Jon Dresser as an abuser from what the RLMDEAF wrote the headline title of blog posting.

RLMDEAF like to point out the general definition of "abuse" have multiple meanings from physical abuse to negligence/mistreatment. That could be the verbal abuse to emotional abuse to mental abuse.

RLMDEAF still stand by defining Jon P Dresser, the former WIC employee as an abuser due to his action of leaving three deaf vulnerable clients in the suffocated and unbreathable van on my latest blog posting.

Excellent link to the meaning of abuse in general via definition -
http://www.mentalhelp.net/poc/center_index.php?id=2

Here is the link to the definition of "abuse" - http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&rlz=1R2RNTN_enUS382&defl=en&q=define:abuse&sa=X&ei=H0YSTKvcGsLflge3pKmLCQ&ved=0CBkQkAE

Not many people realize that the interior temperature of any vehicle(s) are more hotter than the outdoor temperature. Look at the enclosed link -
http://www.mydogiscool.com/x_car_study.php


443 American children died from being left in cars over 10 years. For example, 83'o temp outside, but 123'o temp inside the vehicle(s) -
http://ggweather.com/heat/


Any questions? Any more accusations hurled at me? RLMDEAF answer all your replies and accusations.


RLMDEAF stands for the right to know, right to speak out, right to express freely without any restriction or any kind of censorship.

Here is the very shocking video of how human treated other living creatures in that manner -
http://www.youtube.com/verify_age?next_url=http%3A//www.youtube.com/watch%3Fv%3DgYTkM1OHFQg *WARNING* VERY GRAPHIC IMAGES


ASLize yours,
Robert L. Mason (RLM)
RLMDEAF blog
rlmdeaf@hotmail.com

24 comments:

  1. What did Jon Dresser do was wrong and neglectful. He got arrested. He will go to a trial. But in the meantime, it's "innocent until proven guilty". Let the legal system take care of it.

    I personally think you're getting carried away. Of course, it's your blog and you have every right to write what you want to believe.

    By the way, the windows were rolled down. "Suffocated and unbreathable van".

    ReplyDelete
  2. Remember last Saturday was very hot and humid. There are always two sides of story. Wait and see. Many knows him in Boston area. A big lesson for Jon.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Toby,

    I tried to be pretty objective and fair to Jon Dresser, but could understand what three vulnerable clients had been going through.

    Why in the world Jon tried to do some personal errand or paid job at same time cheating off the WIC in caretaking of those individuals.

    Rolled windows will be not enough to cool off anyone or animal inside the vehicle.

    RLM

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous,

    Thanks for pressing the actual temperature in Boston last Saturday like hot and humid. I truly appreciate it very much. :)

    RLM

    ReplyDelete
  5. I think you got carried away with the audistic thing. Neglect ? even abuse ? but audism ? hate crime ? I would not like to bet on that being found as a verdict. You talk about right and not supporting censorship, so you never censor ?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Hi MM,

    My favorite deaf British, MM!

    In my own definition of "audist" - someone deaf or hearing intentionally oppress or demoralizes or deflate or deny the deaf individual from the rightful postiton.

    Three deaf clients have the right to such
    liveable settings and comforts from any kind of sufferings beyond their control or ability to walk from.

    That is pretty audistic for any deaf people inflict hardship, neglience or systematic maunever of giving anyone deaf a hard time.

    RLM

    ReplyDelete
  7. MM,

    To answer your question whether I did censor anything on my blog posting.

    A's nope, but I had to delete the hurtful comment targeted one deaf individual, especially personal information nothing to do with the subject discussion. Okay?

    RLM

    ReplyDelete
  8. Playing Miss. Paulette Caswell like youre doing is also abuse against the deaf community.

    ReplyDelete
  9. It's his blog. He can say anything he wants. Whether he is getting carried away or not, he can talk about one case as often as he wants to. If we are interested, then we can read his post. If we aren't, then nobody is forcing us to do.

    We know RLM feels strongly about CI and audism. It's no surprise when he rails against them. If it bothers you, then why are you reading his post?

    ReplyDelete
  10. MZ,

    Although I don't agree with him all the time, I find his writing very engaging and thought-provoking. Think Ridor-lite :)

    People don't like Rush Limbaugh or Howard Stern, but they listen to them anyway. Same thing with RLM.

    ReplyDelete
  11. If a deaf man kills another deaf person, would you rather use the term "audist" than "murderer"?

    ReplyDelete
  12. I read somewhere stating "ruth dresser" whether "relative or wife"

    FYI jon dresser's wife's accurate name is Kimberly "kimbo" meltzer or melzer (maiden name)dresser

    black hair, strong curly hair, eye glasses..

    ReplyDelete
  13. RLM,

    did you make plans to appear at court arraignment where jon dresser will be at (court) tomorrow?

    ReplyDelete
  14. Toby,

    That depends on the given situation in response if someone deaf killed another deaf person.

    If the deaf murderer shouted "I kill deaf people cuz I hate them very much. I want to help hearing people to get rid of deaf people!"

    That would be seen as an audistic behavior from the deaf murderer.

    I hope that I answer your question. :)

    RLM

    ReplyDelete
  15. Anonymous,

    To answer your question whether I will make my presence for Jon Dresser's court arraignment or not.

    I am somewhere in the Southeastern United States. I could not make to come down for Jon's court date. Just an arragiment.

    RLM

    ReplyDelete
  16. RLM-before you start posting all of these comments and your so called "sources" you may want to double check to make sure what you are writing is actually correct. I have found so many untrue facts and inconsistencies in almost every blog I have read. You really look ignorant.

    ReplyDelete
  17. That's deaf people's way. They're very quick to blurt out wrong information. They're gullible.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Get your facts straight RLM..wasting bandwidth

    ReplyDelete
  19. That's a really pathetic comment, "that's deaf people's way"? No, it's RLM's way. Not all deaf people are "gullible". Deaf are not a separate "people" they are just like any hearing person. There are intelligent, well education, good people and then there are people like RLM.

    ReplyDelete
  20. You are SICK !!! posting false statements...twisting stories...

    UN - FRIGGIN'-ABLE !!!

    SHAME ON YOU FOR JUDGING PEOPLE - BIBLE SAID NOT TO JUDGE EXCEPT GOD

    ReplyDelete
  21. You folks don't know Jon
    he is a great guy wouldn't hurt
    a fly. He did nothing wrong
    thank god your not on the jury.

    ReplyDelete
  22. wow.. annoymous ... you say " jon would not hurt a fly" ..

    if that were true, he would not be putting 3 clients in discomfort breathing, discomfort environment where there's not enough 'cool air'.
    I got to admit, I tested myself being in van, sitting in the back seat of van, with front windows rolled down, THE FIRST 10 MINUTES, it was only 70 degrees, and I was ALREADY FEELING DISCOMFORT BREATHING!.

    TRY TO IMAGINE WHAT THE CLIENTS FEELING DURING 85 DEGREES!! THAT WOULD BE LIKE AROUND 100 DEGREES, IT WOULD FEEL SUFFOCATION.

    THINGS HAPPEN FOR REASON, WHY??? CLIENTS COULD NOT SPEAK OUT FOR THEMSELVES,
    MAYBE THE NEIGHBOR FIND IT DISTURBING SEEING HERSELF IN A POSITION SEEING JON DOING THIS BEHAVIOR MORE THAN ONCE, AND FELT ' IF I DIDNT SAY ANYTHING AND ONE OF THEM END UP COLLAPSE OR WORSE"

    NEIGHBOR MAY HAVE REALLY SAVED THE 3 CLIENTS. IF IT WASNT FOR THE NEIGHBOR, HOW FAR WOULD JON KEEP DOING THIS ? KEEP REPEATING THIS BEHAVIOR UNTIL CLIENT END UP WORSE? THIS WASNT HIS FIRST TIME.

    JON MAY NOT HURT A FLY, MAYBE ONLY TO THOSE WHO REALLY MATTERED TO HIM ONLY ... BUT THE CLIENTS??? HE DID PUT THEM IN UNHEALTHY JEPORADY ENVIRONMENT ( HOT VAN WITH VERY LITTLE OXYGEN) .. WHAT DOES THAT MEAN? HE STILL DOESNT HURT FLY? THINK HARD.

    IF IF HE REALLY DOESNT HURT A FLY, HE WOULD HAVE ENCOURAGED THEM TO SIT OUTSIDE THE VAN IN THE FIRST PLACE. ALL HE DID WAS THINKING ABOUT HIS LAWN THAT MATTERED TO HIM THE MOST THAN CLIENTS! GRASS MUCH PRIORITY THAN HUMAN BEINGS??

    YES, YOU ARE RIGHT WE CANNOT JUDGE TILL FOUND GUILTY, BUT ACTIONS SPEAK LOUDER . NEIGHBOR WITNESS, COP SHOWED UP, SAW WHERE THE CLIENTS WERE IN, THE CONDITION OF VAN.

    JON WOULD NOT HURT FLY? JON MADE ERROR OF HIS JUDGEMENT.

    SOME OF US SEEN THE DARK SIDE OF JON, WHILE THE REST OF YOU HAVENT. PERIOD. EVERYONE MAKES MISTAKES, AND PEOPLE HAVE DARK SIDES THAT THE REST OF WORLD DON'T SEE. ARE WE ALL PERFECT? I DONT THINK SO, BECAUSE THERES NO SUCH THING PERFECTION, OR NEVER MAKE MISTAKE.

    I HOPE JON LEARNS SOMETHING FROM THIS AND NOT TO REPEAT, THATS ALL IT MATTERS. RIGHT?

    ReplyDelete
  23. hey,

    Ive been so busy.. any updates with jon dresser ?

    july 18th courtdate??

    are you gonna do follow up on this man? give us updates?

    Kitty

    ReplyDelete
  24. Hi Kitty,

    I will be in Boston area for one to two weeks. I will be more than glad to do the update on Jon Dresser's court appointment and whatever it calls. :) Okay? :)

    RLM

    ReplyDelete